Carbon dating disproves evolution

Ernst Haeckel, one of the chief proponents of Darwinism, stated in 1876: "If we do not accept the hypothesis of spontaneous generation, then at this one point in the history of evolution we must have recourse to the miracle of a supernatural creation." The spontaneous generation debate heated up again in 1924 when Russian biochemist, I. Oparin proposed that life had arisen from simpler molecules on the lifeless earth under much different atmospheric conditions than exist today. In the nineteenth century Ernst Haeckel argued that although spontaneous generation was not observable under the current conditions on earth, it did take place in the past under different chemical conditions.

However, instead of life arising suddenly, as previous spontaneous generation theories proposed, Oparin believed that it occurred over a very long period of time. Oparin and Haldane made the first serious proposals regarding those conditions.

By the end of the nineteenth century, the majority of scientists believed that spontaneous generation was not possible.

Loyal Darwinists, however, insisted on spontaneous generation, recognizing that it was the foundation upon which evolutionary theory rests. Haldane published a paper in which he proposed that ultraviolet light, acting on a primitive atmosphere containing water, ammonia and methane produced oceans with the consistency of a "hot dilute soup" containing the building blocks of life.

During the dark ages, people speculated that rats and flies arose spontaneously from garbage because they mysteriously appeared when garbage was left out.

As a condition of submitting feedback to the editor, you must agree that your comment may be published at some future date, in which case you agree to transfer the copyright to Creation Ministries International.Where we have linked to a review or other article on an external website, we do not necessarily endorse all of the views expressed therein and are merely providing the link for your convenience. , but are meant to provide information from a wide range of viewpoints and expertise on scientific issues, religious issues, and the interface between the two, particularly in the area of creation and evolution.Darwinism influenced her support for eugenics and reducing the population of ‘less fit’ races, including ‘Negroes’. With the exception of personal information, email is reprinted as received, generally including mistakes in spelling and grammar.Web links or personal information may be deleted at the editor’s discretion.

Search for carbon dating disproves evolution:

carbon dating disproves evolution-48carbon dating disproves evolution-4

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “carbon dating disproves evolution”